Subscription pricing
I got this wrong both in time and BR, but now I think I understand the reasoning. Can someone out there confirm or correct my logic?
Stim: 1. if scandal occurs and voters' blame is shared across 1 or more parties then incumbents are re-elected
2. if scandal occurs and voters' blame is on 1 party, then regardless of who challenges, incumbents are not re-elected
3. Independent of the presence of scandals, incumbents run at similar rates.
Ques: whats the principle which accounts for this?
Ans: (E) Admin Note: I deleted Answer Choice E as it is against our Forum Rules to post the Answer Choices on the Forum.
Ans trans: If blame is shared across multiple parties then it is the fault of individuals not of the party, but if one party gets the blame then party ought to pay price (ie not re-electing it's incumbents).
Thanks in advance for the help!
My personal experience and the people I've read here experiencing meaningful change seem to point toward first ensuring that the lowest hanging fruit always fall in your basket and that will make some of the harder LR questions more transparent. The core curriculum really has such great intro to logic which helps in quickly and correctly reading each Stimulus. Difficulty of LR can depend on the language used in the stimulus and/or the subtlety of the insight being sought in the by the question stem.
If your logic is sound for simpler questions you'll have more time in the section to chew on difficult questions. Additionally, you'll better be able to recognize a difficult question out of the gate so time doesn't get wasted trying to get it when there are easier questions waiting to be answered correctly, swiftly. Then returning to the hardest 1-3 questions with clear eyes is an option.
If you've got the time the earliest episodes 7sage Podcast feature 7Sagers who really crushed it on the Exam (170+) and they all break down their own detailed approaches to improvement.
Good Luck!