- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I am slightly confused... if someone could please provide clarity it would be greatly appreciated!
In the previous lesson, the diagram labeled as Causal Logic (Hypothesis) with Resolve at the top and then it went down to Weaken. Under the Weaken portion I have (Causal Logic with Alternative Hypothesis, Ideal Experiment, & Corroborating Data) all pointing toward Weaken. Then it goes down to Strengthen and the Causal Logic I have ( Cost Benefit Reasoning, Reasoning By Analogy, & Rule-Application). At that time I was under the impression that each of those sets coordinates with the either Weaken or Strengthen. However, in this diagram it now displays each plus more under Strengthen. Did I interpret it wrong initially by mentally separating because they aligned with either Weaken or Strengthen? When in fact, any of the possibilities could fall under either one?
I need some help... why do I get the V. low priority correct, but V. high incorrect? Any suggestions to resolving this? #help