the wording is so so evil. I read it had only Medina shares (as in reveals, expresses) her opinion, not as shares (in agreement). I honestly don't know how I was supposed to know to interpret that wording differently

I am confused on B for Q21, I thought one of the stipulations of this was the lawyer couldn't charge insane fees, isn't that what the consulting firm is doing?

@BrentZ from my understanding, the claim is not universal because if i view comprehension as a physical action and gesture more, but you view it as abstract and do not gesture, in my point of view, the claim is not universal because we did not both gesture for a physical concept. however we know that the conclusion is saying that this reasoning (you not gesturing) is not a valid to reject the claim because our different understanding of the word comprehension is what created a non-universal result. it doesn't mean the claim is universal because there are still these discrepancies, however it is saying that that is not enough to discredit

I initially didn't chose B because I thought it was a trick because of the possibility that the bacteria attacked the respiratory systems but that wasn't the cause of death or something along those lines

10/12!

10/15 then 14/15 - for passage two, I really needed to read the question more closely because I chose the answers that related to the entire passage rather than the specific paragraph like the question was asking

9/14 the BR was 13/14!! I think I went to fast and needed to read more closely

4/5 then 5/5 BR: I kind of look at this like a puzzle and try to fit the answer choices into the framework of the stimulus and found that that helps me solve and with my time, but i feel shaky about my choices when making them tbh

5/5!! over time, but I was really confident in each of my answer selections after deciding why each answer was correct/incorrect

5/5, timing was bad on the first question, 30 sec over on 2 & 3, but under time for the last two!!