after going back I think it helped me to realize that the authors argument is that what other people argued is wrong (OPA: moral codes differ -> morality must be different across cultures). if this is wrong then the author must be saying in some type of way that this relationship does not hold and that they (moral codes and morality) can coincide with each other

I reasoned that maybe L and N had no stance on the one position Kay had and therefore she disagreed with all three 0 times. I guess my brain was too far in Point at Issue questions

I assumed arrowheads were the same as spears which was why I chose D over E

so it's kind of like thinking there was a circle on insomniacs and 90% of that pie drinks large amounts of coffee. Know we know that Tom drinks lots of coffee. Now invision another circle that includes people who drink lots of coffee. We do not know how many (the frequency) of the large coffee drinkers overlap with the insomniacs. it could my that there are so many large amount of coffee drinkers that there is only a small % of them who are insomniacs and that amount makes up 90% of the insomniacs

Soooo the answer choice refers to a specific term "religious" but then references the term "divine" as one of the meanings of religious? and we are supposed to make the jump that divine and religious are two different uses of "religious"? or are they referring to the other "religious" and not "divine"?

#help (Added by Admin)

With this fill in the blank question you have to add the additional piece of information in order to make the conclusion work. the conclusion is that these hotels cant increase their profits. We know that there are two ways to increase profits, building or improving. building has been accounted for and you cant build, therefore if a hotel is going to increase profits here they would need to improve their quality. But since we are trying to prove that these hotels cant increase profits we have to say something along the lines that these hotels can not improve their quality any more which is what D says, since not one would be willing to pay for such improvements

If you take A to say that they cant kick any guests out in order to make improvements you can think of it as an investment, loose the $50 of the guest staying the one night in order to make $200 after renovations. At some point you will increase your profit.

With some practice (and a whole semester of a logic class in college) I try to see the conditionals as I read. So if a question is asking to find the flaw and it reads "if it is a tree, then it is green" I try and see the conditional "tree-> green". Especially if I see "only" or "Only if" because those indicators are going to be tricky. Then you can prompt your brain to think about what should come next if it is going to be a valid solution

I would definitely keep up with LR questions as you move onto further sections! Such as doing 10LR questions after every grouping of LG lessons, or sections. Keeps you fresh and by the time you finish LG you'll be surprised at how much better you are at LR