Same. I've been PTing twice a week. Still studying every day and my test is on Sunday. I'm so burnt out and I wonder if I should just chill out this week...I'd love to know the answer to solving this conundrum as well.

WHY WOULDNT YOU ASSUME THATS WHAT THE AUTHOR MEANT? Aaaaaaaarghhh. Increasing means going up. I couldnt infer that he meant the increasing would stop after 'young people' aged out of being young...why would I infer the inverse? That young people would stop being increasingly disconnected after they aged out? Omg my brain.

I asked LSAC a while back and they said the email with all the information will be sent out 1-2 weeks prior to the test date. Must be yet another test to fortify our type-A personalities. Ugh.

I feel similarly about 'some', but my issue is more that 'some' doesn't include the Acanthostega in question. The stimulus sounds to me like an argument for Acanthostega to be considered, but is not conclusively found to be, an aquatic animal. So I'm just relinquishing my hope for getting SOME questions right.

I'll try to be there. Thank you!

I'm January 2021! I finished the curriculum a week ago and have to start PTing. It is such an overwhelming task to work 5+ hours on the test then blind review. I def need motivation and accountability. Please let me know if there's a group started. I'd love to join!

I have the same question about 'how without math?', but as JY wrote it out, I understood a bit more.

If the total added is 2500 and the total replaced is 2000--while alcohol stays the same for both--the proportion of alcohol calories to total amounts is greater in the smaller total (2000) caloric intake.

I'm really just writing this out as a tool for me to understand...

buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut...

I thought the passage was persuasive, and the author was trying to argue against a premise as to why one would want stricter copyright laws. Like, the conclusion is "changing copyright law...is thus ill-advised". A premise supporting the conclusion is that links aren't at issue regarding ownership and therefore shouldn't inform the decision to strengthen copyright law. Right??? I'm so confused. #help

but isnt it a property of microwaves to heat inconsistently, whether at 50c or elsewhere on the thermometer, and thus (e) would strengthen the author's claim?