@ said:

Does anyone know if the LR section will still be more heavily weighted on the LSAT-flex like on normal LSATs?

YES. This is the critical question for me. LR is now underweighted compared to the normal LSAT, unless they are planning to weigh LR more heavily. LR is my best section by far so this is a critical question and seems unfair that LSAT Flex places a different emphasis on sections (more emphasis on RC and LG).

I'm struggling with the translation of C to "lawgic". JY translates it to /VC → /LST. I see how it can be read that way. However, I think it depends on which definition of susceptible you read. If you interpret susceptible as "likely or liable", then JY/LSAC's understanding makes sense. However, susceptible has another definition as "capable of". I read susceptible this way and thought C was introducing a new class of social systems which are not capable of value change. So you have this new society where values always stay constant (not hard to imagine on the LSAT) and C says that you will not have LST in this society (you can have T, but it will not LS (save labor)). But this is a totally new argument (not something MSS). SNVC (society with no value change) → /LST vs. /VC → /LST

Totally different antecedent and so I eliminated all answer choices.

(running out of time here to flesh this out, but any feedback would be helpful) #help

Hi, This is a great idea. I'd love to join