Discussions

thomasafredericks654

Joined: Apr 2025
Subscription: Free

General

•

Thursday, May 29

thomasafredericks654

advice for putting it all together

I seem to be having trouble on my PT's keeping both LR and RC up at the same time. I've been bouncing around 165 on all my PT's (lowest: 162, highest:169). My best LR section is -1 and my best RC section is -2 so I know I have the raw capacity to score very well, however I cant seem to put it all together on one practice test and break out of this mid-160s plateau. It feels like I finish a PT, review what I got wrong and then the next PT shows improvement in that area but I lose ground somewhere else and end up getting the same score I have been getting for the last month. Any advice on how to stop this infernal game of whack-a-mole and club both LR and RC over the head in the same PT would be much appreciated. Any other advice relating to breaking plateaus is welcomed as well :)

Lessons · Skill Builder - Conjunction, Disjunction, and De Morgan's

thomasafredericks654

Wednesday, Feb 26

anyone else interperate #5 as an "and" question? this was my answer:

21+ & inUS → legaly purchase alc

contrapositive: /(legaly purchase alc) → /21+ or /inUS

I think my answer makes sense but maybe on the actual test looking at the question stem would help to provide context on how to translate into lawgic

LSAT · Making Things Stick in RC

thomasafredericks654

Saturday, May 10

i was having touble with this and it helped me a lot to start using the highlighter tool. what to highlight is kind of hard to say without looking at a specific passage, but i usually will highlight names of people involved, definitions given in the passage, and things that stand out to me as important to the authors POV. i think highlighting these details helps me to be able to better focus on how they all connect.