I think this is clearly an advantage for some, a disadvantage for others. RC is a severely inconsistent section for me, LGs I am getting 3/4 games almost perfect, and LR is consistently pretty strong. If I bomb RC (which I have been known to do on PTs) on LSAT flex, assuming that if all sections are worth 33%, it will affect my score SIGNIFICANTLY more than on a standard 5 section LSAT with 2 LR sections to save my behind. However, there are some who struggle with severe test anxiety and with flex being an at-home test, they may find some relief from that anxiety.
Personally, I wouldn't mind flex if they made the LR section worth more than the others. Is that on the table?
Finally, do we think LSAC or maybe 7sage will create flex PTs? Or will it be too hard to illustrate the curve until after the first flex scores are released?
I think this is clearly an advantage for some, a disadvantage for others. RC is a severely inconsistent section for me, LGs I am getting 3/4 games almost perfect, and LR is consistently pretty strong. If I bomb RC (which I have been known to do on PTs) on LSAT flex, assuming that if all sections are worth 33%, it will affect my score SIGNIFICANTLY more than on a standard 5 section LSAT with 2 LR sections to save my behind. However, there are some who struggle with severe test anxiety and with flex being an at-home test, they may find some relief from that anxiety.
Personally, I wouldn't mind flex if they made the LR section worth more than the others. Is that on the table?
Finally, do we think LSAC or maybe 7sage will create flex PTs? Or will it be too hard to illustrate the curve until after the first flex scores are released?