I'm with others in that age isn't relevant. I'm turning 32 this year and taking it. My official June score was a 168, taking it one more time in September to see if I can crack into the 170s... otherwise I'll go ahead with my June score.

For me, this was such a poorly worded question. If it was "not most kids spend their free time reading, so not most kids will develop a lifelong interest in reading" then (B) would make sense. We need to rule out any other source of kids developing a lifelong interest in reading, which makes free time reading the necessary condition.

However, since the stimulus says "few kids spend their free time reading, so a few kids will develop a lifelong interest in literature", so it sounds like if spending free time reading is a sufficient condition to developing lifelong interest in literature, then that pretty much guarantees the conclusion.

It's one of my top choices, but for fall 2025. I'm signed up for the June LSAT, hoepfully I can get a 168+ to be a "splitter".

#19: Does approach also refer to theoretical approach? Whenever I hear "approach" I hear laboratory procedures and nothing like the passage where it's purely theoretical.

A lot of the answer choices seems to rely on being able to presume that it's impossible to have the exactly same starting conditions. A lot of LR drills led me to be so wary of such absolute terms...

(B) is the trick answer and (E) is the correct answer. Write out both and see which supports which and which is supported by the other.