How do you guys review your wrong answer journal? Once I fill in the information about why i got it wrong and why the right answer is right etc, i just move on and don't really review after. Does anyone have a good system?
You are an angel ! Thank you :)
I keep getting stuck on where to put the slash in a conditional diagram that has "no" or "none", has anyone figured out at tip that helps them? Also is without a sufficient or necessary indicator?
I am a bit confused about why it couldn't be case that the large size was both for winters and as a larger defense...i don't see how it explicitly weakens the claim, since the conclusion isn't discussing how or why it developed, just that it's a good defense.
#help (Added by Admin)
Hey! Thanks for your reply maco! I appreciate the tip. I started to do this thing too where i just do not change it unless i am absolutely more confident that the other answer is right. If im stuck between two and really can't see which is better then i keep my first pick. Whereas before i would frantically switch back and fourth at the end and essentially guess. Esp in LR. That's a good tip to trust that my gut felt that something was wrong about the wrong AC. Thanks a ton.
Do you guys go in order when answering RC questions? Would be appreciative if someone could give me examples of their strategy. At a bit of a RC slump.
Is the LSAT still the flex version for 2023? Is it 4 sections, 3 scored and one experimental? So out of 77 instead of 100?
Does anyone have a good template for their wrong answer journal for reading comprehension?
I am consistently missing 3 to 5 on RC and I am unable to get it down to a -0-2~3 range. Has anyone been in this situation and are you willing to share tips for getting over the hump?
I take notes for each paragraph, try to highlight wrong portions of answers. I seem to miss analogy questions a lot and I noticed that every time I change my answer I tend to get it wrong. I feel like I need to be disciplined about changing my answer from my gut instinct, but I seem to convince myself that I should change it every time.
thanks!
I have noticed a peculiar trend where the LR questions that I tend to miss most are not the ones that I flag but instead the random other ones. I realized that I almost never miss the questions I flag but I miss the ones that I don't flag.
Omg you are so amazing. This was so helpful. In the explanation JY says that what they both don't discuss is helping people. That is the key item that should not be in the answer choice, not emigration.
tiptonmaude502
Hey! I remember reading somewhere or learning from an explanation video that in disagree questions each author must explicitly state the answer choice in order for it to be correct. Therefore, an answer choice wouldn't be correct if only one author discusses it.
Here is the question I am stuck on: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-3-question-19/
The correct answer is B. I eliminated all of the answer choices discussing emigration because Raphaela doesn't discuss emigration. Could someone provide more insight into their method for disagree questions?
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question" Also, please do not post the entire question and answer choices for the LSAC question, this is against the Forum Rules
Is anyone having the problem where it only allows you to schedule an in person test? I want to test remotely now.
Do the law school essays change from year to year usually? I am not applying this cycle but trying to plan when to leave my job. Will I not be able to start writing my supplemental essays until September most likely? Or will this year likely serve as a good base?
Could someone explain to me how C is wrong? How can we assume that the direct logical opposite of being self-disparaging and dismissive of others is being accepting of oneself and accepting of others? How do we know there is no grey area, especially because the argument concludes that these characteristics are "on the whole"? One could be both at the same time, in varying degrees, at different points in time. #help (Added by Admin)
I have been missing -4 pretty consistently on LR for a long time. I started around -6, been studying for about 3 months. I know I can get my LR down to -2. Anyone been in this situation have any tips?
the argument already states that we are not lending to companies that are not financially strong, so doesn't that cover the need to further show under what circumstances banks will lend? A feels redundant to me. I put it first but changed to D.
#help (added by Admin)
I am also having this issue.
Do you have the link to the rest of the videos explaining the groups?