The answer notes that fulfilling the exemption only means that the rule is silent—even if we know that manufacturers would reap large benefits, we do not know if we should presume vagueness as deception. Concluding that corporations standing to reap large benefits should have their vagueness presumed to be deception would be flipping the sufficient and necessary conditions.
In other words, it is necessary that a company stand to reap large benefits in order for a consumer to presume their vagueness as deception, but it is not sufficient. because there here could be other necessary conditions that need to be fulfilled for customers to presume vagueness as deception. For example, a company may have to have over 100 employees.
4
Update available
7Sage has been updated. Refresh when you're ready to load the latest version.
The answer notes that fulfilling the exemption only means that the rule is silent—even if we know that manufacturers would reap large benefits, we do not know if we should presume vagueness as deception. Concluding that corporations standing to reap large benefits should have their vagueness presumed to be deception would be flipping the sufficient and necessary conditions.
In other words, it is necessary that a company stand to reap large benefits in order for a consumer to presume their vagueness as deception, but it is not sufficient. because there here could be other necessary conditions that need to be fulfilled for customers to presume vagueness as deception. For example, a company may have to have over 100 employees.