Every time I get a hard question right I do a little happy dance shacha-shacha

poop question

@170PlusRyan What does it mean to be too strong?

I HATE THE LSAT

If your blind reviews are in the 168-176 range, you're on a good track. The key is just to study well and study which fallacious arguments you've made so your mode of reasoning isn't as flawed for the actual test. This can be keeping a journal or re-taking questions or both. For reading comprehension, this is a lot more difficult obviously as the content of questions largely depends on your understanding of the passage which is just reading comprehension.

@baneen.02 We don't assume that pollution causes cancer. This is a causation-correlation fallacy. Just because high average fat intake is correlated with higher cancer rates doesn't mean it's a causal relationship like the argument presumes. By the author's logic however, anything correlated with anything is causal. Therefore, high fat intake is correlated with high levels of pollution. This is different from answer B because B says it tends to rather than D saying "are also"

For the people who are confused why C is wrong, there are two reasons. Even if it were true that most jogging injuries are not preventable with stretching, the argument is that stretching helps prevent injuries even if they are a minority of the total injuries. Furthermore, D is an answer choice that would be stronger as it directly attributes the two samples to have equal injuries despite one group being explicitly more prone to them.