- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
@jhaldy10325 You don’t question either element independently of the other.
Thanks for the tips. I wasn't sure if LSAC would include these older types of parallel flaw questions in the newer tests. I was just under the impression, one was supposed to assume the speaker doesn't have ulterior motives, etc... Perhaps you could elaborate on this too! Thanks again.
The question is as follows:
Admin edit: Please do not post full questions on the discussion forums! Removed the question.
I chose (A), but it was incorrect because the actual correct answer is (B). I understand the reasoning behind why answer choice (B) is correct. However, I am concerned as to the actual fact that we are taught to consider the stimulus truth and to not question the premise, rather we ought to question the conclusions.
As this was an older LSAT - ought test takers still concern themselves with these types of questions (where the premise/speaker of said premise may be questionable)?
Hope to receive word from someone soon.
Anyone else having sound issues? Cannot hear what JY is saying at all....
This particular question was a pain - circular reasoning can be easily mapped out by simply diagramming?
Hey OP,
I've actually bought all powerscore books, 3 books with the 10 prep tests by lsac, the super prep book by lsac, and I also have the Princeton review cracking the lsat 2015 book. Also good to purchase a few older lsat tests like 70, 71, & 72
All these books have helped me tremendously in addition to this course and testmasters prep course I'm well prepared to take this lsat test on the 3rd.
Hope this helps.
when can I get office hours with Miss Columbia 2016? ;)