Discussions

wang58864

Joined: Apr 2025
Subscription: Free

Study Groups · August LSAT Study Group (174+)

wang58864

Monday, May 30 2022

Interested! 163-165 range pacific time zone

LSAT · Reading Comp/Law school

wang58864

Tuesday, Jan 25 2022

I think discussing your thought with someone as you are reading the passage actually helps! If you can get -2 with LG and LR combined, that means you don't have any problem with reading. You may just not doing it in the correct way.

Study Groups · Looking for a supportive group of people aiming for 175+ over Zoom

wang58864

Wednesday, Mar 23 2022

same time zone same working schedule pls add me too

PrepTests ·

PT109.S1.Q20

wang58864

Monday, Jul 20 2020

phenomenon: 1.painting does not contain see animals 2.Norway ppl must eat sea animals when traveling from the islands

conclusion: the theory of the painting is about their diet is not right

weaken the argument: to make the theory sounds right

A. they eat land animals ->attack 2.

B. there are probably other parts of paintings we didn't see contains see animals ->attack 1.

C.there are paintings about land animals, so what? we don't know if it is part of their diet, we only know about sea animals from the stimulus

D.preserve meets ->attack 2.

E. original inhabitants who eat meats made those paintings, they may still eat sea animals and make paintings somewhere else

Study Groups · Offering FREE "semi-tutoring" for Nov. LSAT takers (from an avg. 170+ PT scorer)

wang58864

Monday, Oct 18 2021

Hi I'm interested! I completed CC, PT 35-70 and currently working on PT 80s and up, 2 PT a week while full time working. Pacific Time. Would like to find someone to go over some questions together once or twice a week, available on every Thursday, Friday or Saturday.

Study Groups · 169+ Strategy Group (Beyond the Basics)

wang58864

Sunday, Jul 17 2022

Interested!

LSAT · PT91.S2.Q13 - C vs D

wang58864

Tuesday, Nov 16 2021

Hey, the key is to understand the conclusion here is : to help the patient heal, the psychotherapist must focus on the need for positive change in those relationships.

The conclusion have this structure of to do something, one MUST do something. The flaw here is why can't I do something else to achieve the same results? why is focusing on need for positive change in relationships absolutely necessary?

D is saying no psychotherapist can help help solely by addressing internal causes which means to help them heal, they must do things other than internal causes, which is perfect.

C is talking about patient but the conclusion is concluding about what psychotherapist must do, so it is irrelevant.

LSAT · PT92.S1.Q11 - Studies indicate that North Americans are becoming more lethargic

wang58864

Tuesday, Nov 16 2021

Hey! D actually supports E. You can say the studies failed to consider one probable cause of lethargy therefore researcher's conclusion was not adequately justified but NOT the other way around. so E is the conclusion because it is being supported by the rest of the argument.

PrepTests ·

PT132.S4.Q26

wang58864

Wednesday, Sep 15 2021

RRR

less overlap between malnurish and poverty in elderly than younger population

need to resolve the reasoning: poor can cause malnourish, but in elderly, many of them are not poor but still more malnourished, why?

A. doctors are less likely to diagnose old peeps - not because are less likely, because not correctly diagnosed

B. certain meds for older increase their nutrition needs - not because of poverty

C. old ppls more likely loss of apetite due to meds - not because of poverty

E. younger ppl less likely to have medical problems interfere with digestion - old ppl more likely - not because of poverty

LSAT · PT91.S2.Q18: What is the conclusion?

wang58864

Sunday, Nov 14 2021

That's the exactly the premise to get to the conclusion.

In order to guarantees the truth, instead of using MAY, it needs to be modified as:

THE ONLY way students can attain perfect knowledge is to immerse themselves in a country where it is spoken.

MAY opens up the possibilities that even if you can't get perfect by this method, there are other methods you can achieve the same goal.

LSAT · PT91.S2.Q18: What is the conclusion?

wang58864

Friday, Nov 12 2021

D is wrong because it does not guarantees the truth. The premise says the best students of a modern language MAY so immerse themselves.

Study Groups · August 2022 LSAT Buddies

wang58864

Thursday, Jun 09 2022

Hi DM me if you are in Pacific time zone! I'm in the same range studying for August.

Study Groups · Study Group for June/August exams! Tutor with 178 in server.

wang58864

Thursday, Jun 09 2022

Interested!

Study Groups · Looking for accountability partners on IG.

wang58864

Thursday, Jun 09 2022

Interested!

PrepTests ·

PT131.S3.Q19

wang58864

Friday, Nov 05 2021

(understand words → knowing definition) --> (understand word → understand the words that occur in that definition)

If babies understand words, but some babies don’t understand words that occur in that definition, that is: understand words and /(understand the words that occur in that definition), the negation of the necessary condition, so if you run contrapositive, negate the sufficient, it will be: understand words but not all knowing the definition, which is answer choice E.

Study Groups · 169 official LSAT looking for a RC study partner (1 Daily RC passage) BR 2-3 person group

wang58864

Saturday, Feb 04 2023

Interested, but can only do it daily on days except Sundays and Mondays.

LSAT · Free LR Tutoring

wang58864

Saturday, Aug 01 2020

I am still in my early stage of studying. Can you share how many hours you devoted to LR to get -1 or -2? Thank you!

LSAT

•

Friday, Oct 01 2021

wang58864

PTC.S3.Q18 MBF Chelas and Stelma

Can anyone please help explain this question? very confused..

My thought:

C and S are required to leave their respective stations immediately to pursue any prisoner who attempts to escape.

prisoner escape --> leave

unless they are pursuing such a prisoner, C and S are forbidden to leave until their replacements have arrived.

leave --> replacement arrived or pursue prisoner ??? is that correct?

On 9-11pm, when they finished shifts and replacement arrived, it was discovered that C had violated these rules and S has not.

Pick could be true except:

A prisoner attempted to escape at 7pm, neither C or S left his or her station before 9pm.

Why is this the correct answer?

All the answer choices don't really make any sense to me. Not sure how to apply because the one person violate the other one did not situation completely threw me off...

Please help! Thank you!!!!

PrepTests ·

PT137.S4.Q8

wang58864

Wednesday, Sep 01 2021

Principle: if disproportionally effect low incomes, policy should not be made

Application: de-icing on roads corrodes cars, plan should be halted

AC B: road maintenance disproportionally effect low incomes

problem with this answer is de-icing and road maintenance are not the same thing. also, de-icing will effect cars for sure but we don't know anything about roads

D: connects corrosion of cars with disproportionally effecting lower income ppl

PrepTests ·

PT131.S2.Q18

wang58864

Monday, Nov 01 2021

This argument is easy to understand if you have a clear timeline in mind.

For RIGHT NOW, because human food-producing capacity has increased more rapidly, which is cited as a fact, Malthus’s position is wrong.

However in the FUTURE, agricultural advances will compromise biological diversity. Malthus’s position will likely be proven correct because of this lack of diversity.

General · LSAT Study Buddy-- Full Time Work Schedule

wang58864

Monday, Aug 01 2022

If you are in the Pacific time zone, PM me!