Serious question . How can you apply the read passage a first then eliminate / answer questions based on passages before going to passage b without taking more time to write down the options you do t like bc the law hub doesn’t allow you to cross out answer choices you don’t like o. Their interface the way seven sage provides the x. It makes me hesitant to employ that strategy when it seems like it would be more work to write down. All of the options you did not like as opposed to being able to x them out and definitively know how you feel. What do you guys do in this case or how do you theoretically approach that in your mind bc in mine it feels like it would be a waste of time and my 6 pages to have to list out all the options I didn’t choose .
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
S
This is actually so hard for me to learn but i am trying. I am hoping this is worth taking the extra time to learn because I almost want to skip all of this notation because i am worried I am stressing myself out more than i need to fr but i do want the best chance at doing well.
for8.3 I am not understanding how it is bd--->cruel. I would think that the subject is bullying but that is also the predicate being shown and now I am confusion because when i did the notation it only makes sense in my head for it to be cruel-->bully
/cruel-->/bully
A makes sense given the explanation but I thought E because if the snakes are hard to eradicate then that means that they are constantly killing the birds which would result in the spider population increasing?
but why not draw a some statement for the some statement in the text???
I appreciate your kind words! I meant that tuition would be free if I got in but I would need at least a 160 for that given my gpa is below their 25th percentile. I am also retaking in January but applying to 2 schools in December that have early deadlines for financial considerations.
I took my diagnostic back in august and got 148. Since then I have been working through the curriculum. I made it through the foundations and first part of logical reasoning with the old version before I realized there was a newer one I should be on. since then I restarted the new version and redid grammar bc I felt I was shaky, I did all of the foundations and 22 percent of the logic part and 66 percent of the rc curriculum. About a month in I took another diagnostic (while at work and being interrupted) and scored a 149. I assumed that because I was at work that contributed to my low score and that it would generally show my improvement since then if I was in a controlled environment. However, after 3 months of studying as much as I could manage with working full time and being in grad school I scored yet again another 149 on the first round and actually blind reviewed the entire test and still only managed a 150. I am at a loss right now and feeling super discouraged. I only have a 3.3 from undergrad so I do need the lsat with my admissions. For reference I want to apply the year and not wait until next year bc I am currently working at a university that has free tuition for employees and a law school. I hate my job but that makes it worth it and everything would be so convent. I just am feeing discouraged right now and at a loss. I know I haven't finished the curriculum, but how is it possible that I am stuck in the same place as when I started. It makes me feel like all of this ha been for nothing.
how is this a 3 star and not five. I could see the flaw but could not wrap my head around C for the life of me