Just had this issue myself, couldn't ping the website as well.

I was fighting between C and D but the negation test always saves my life:

Negating D as "physical act ... is essential" would destroy their argument and (hopefully) keep one less buggy piece of CAD software from reaching my computer. I want whatever these "experts" are on.

I was stuck between A and E, I originally chose A because I erroneously ruled out E because I misunderstood the meaning behind "consistent with the occurrence of such cases".

I should've looked at A more carefully because I got excited by the first part of the answer. Reading the second part, "as though they have more weight as evidence than do the other experiences of people" is wrong because George doesn't discredit the experiences of other people, he only discredits the claim.

I was stuck between A and C but I went with A because I thought LSAT exam writers would hit me with the "haha screw you, we didn't define first and second". That's what I get for trying to metagame the exam.

"It concludes that one thing was caused by another although ... first thing's having the second" put me to sleep halfway through.

I ruled out E because I forgot about the "eaten by humans" part, makes much more sense after including that.

"did not show a reduction in losses"

What an inconveniently worded question... I was too lazy to reword it in my mind. "did show a reduction in losses" would make A true, so that's why I immediately ruled out C.

Whoops, got Eva and Luis confused.