User Avatar
xaja3993594
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar

Friday, Oct 29 2021

xaja3993594

PT91.S2.Q22, Q23, & Q24 help

Hey everyone, I just took PT91 on lawhub and was wondering if anybody would be willing to help me out with a few explanations for some of the questions, specifically:

22: I chose E but not for any particular reason other than I didn't want to waste more time than needed on the question.

23: I can sort of see why AC (A) is the correct answer and if I read it more carefully I would've probably chose it but I chose AC (B) instead. I was stuck between both answers but in my head I was thinking AC (B) was correct because of how the last sentences says "cannot be caused by a simple phenomenon"

24: Was stuck between AC (C + D) ended up choosing C because of the time constraint and failed to realize that the use of 'some animals' obviously implies humans. Just wanted to confirm that C mentioning the precise location of genes is completely irrelevant to weakening the argument.

Much thanks to anyone who decides to explain these to me!

PrepTests ·
PT150.S2.Q5
User Avatar
xaja3993594
Wednesday, Oct 06 2021

I'm sorry, I still don't see why AC B is wrong. In the video, JY says that 'GM' is introduced as the necessary condition but when he diagrams it, he puts 'GM' in the sufficient condition.

I think what's really tripping me up is the fact that there is a sufficient condition he didn't diagram.

#help

PrepTests ·
PT155.S4.Q23
User Avatar
xaja3993594
Thursday, Nov 04 2021

As @Saaamuel points out below, LSAC wants us to make the huge assumption that Indian people are specifically making/eating Indian curries. All stereotyping set aside, they could've just said that Indians put more turmeric in their curries than do other ethnic groups...either way this question & the AC are asking us to make a big ass assumption

Confirm action

Are you sure?