- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Skeet has a couple of meanings so I can’t shit on JY too much because of my dirty mind
As @Saaamuel points out below, LSAC wants us to make the huge assumption that Indian people are specifically making/eating Indian curries. All stereotyping set aside, they could've just said that Indians put more turmeric in their curries than do other ethnic groups...either way this question & the AC are asking us to make a big ass assumption
How would we have more idle cars if there is little to no congestion? If there's little to no congestion, isn't it reasonable to assume that there is more moving cars?
Hey everyone, I just took PT91 on lawhub and was wondering if anybody would be willing to help me out with a few explanations for some of the questions, specifically:
22: I chose E but not for any particular reason other than I didn't want to waste more time than needed on the question.
23: I can sort of see why AC (A) is the correct answer and if I read it more carefully I would've probably chose it but I chose AC (B) instead. I was stuck between both answers but in my head I was thinking AC (B) was correct because of how the last sentences says "cannot be caused by a simple phenomenon"
24: Was stuck between AC (C + D) ended up choosing C because of the time constraint and failed to realize that the use of 'some animals' obviously implies humans. Just wanted to confirm that C mentioning the precise location of genes is completely irrelevant to weakening the argument.
Much thanks to anyone who decides to explain these to me!
You can only use the negation test on Necessary Assumption Q's while this is a Sufficient Assumption Q.
Hello everyone, I apologize if this has been discussed previously but has there been any word on when 7Sage plans to post explanation videos to the PT's in the title?
I'm sorry, I still don't see why AC B is wrong. In the video, JY says that 'GM' is introduced as the necessary condition but when he diagrams it, he puts 'GM' in the sufficient condition.
I think what's really tripping me up is the fact that there is a sufficient condition he didn't diagram.
#help
JY thinks he's slick by trying to recover from that 'Skeet' line (0:46)
I was overthinking it as usual; thank you, this clarifies it perfectly.
I got tripped up because E didn't mention Mary but I'm still a little confused on why B is wrong when the stimulus says that everyone in the waiting room registered for beginners tennis.
Is it because AC B fails to distinguish between everyone in the office and everyone in the 'waiting room' specifically?
#help
I believe they have but it's just super rare because there aren't too many words that could be equivocated plus it's pretty easy to spot when it happens.
balLSAC hates givin out freebies on flaw Q's