Hey everyone, I just took PT91 on lawhub and was wondering if anybody would be willing to help me out with a few explanations for some of the questions, specifically:
22: I chose E but not for any particular reason other than I didn't want to waste more time than needed on the question.
23: I can sort of see why AC (A) is the correct answer and if I read it more carefully I would've probably chose it but I chose AC (B) instead. I was stuck between both answers but in my head I was thinking AC (B) was correct because of how the last sentences says "cannot be caused by a simple phenomenon"
24: Was stuck between AC (C + D) ended up choosing C because of the time constraint and failed to realize that the use of 'some animals' obviously implies humans. Just wanted to confirm that C mentioning the precise location of genes is completely irrelevant to weakening the argument.
Much thanks to anyone who decides to explain these to me!
I'm sorry, I still don't see why AC B is wrong. In the video, JY says that 'GM' is introduced as the necessary condition but when he diagrams it, he puts 'GM' in the sufficient condition.
I think what's really tripping me up is the fact that there is a sufficient condition he didn't diagram.
#help