@debbx No. The conclusion is saying It necessarily follows that consumers who do not bother are behaving rationally. Using Group 3 "negate sufficient," the conditional for the premise is represented as IF NOT expect THEN rational. Thus, E is our correct choice because it's allowing us to assume the Sufficient Condition: Consumers who do not bother DO NOT expect-- and now it necessarily follows that they are behaving rationally.

For this question, I attacked the point of a majority law-abiding environment being incapable of promoting a culture of lawlessness. By consequence, how can this environment be responsible for lawless actions? Is this an unsupported defense?