Isn't AC D a mistaken application of negation to both sufficient and necessary conditions? This seems like P → C structure to me. How do we know Complexity implies inferiority when the stimulus only states that simplicity implies superiority? So this means that there is no middle ground between simplicity and complexity?

#help

I had LR(26Qs) -RC(27Qs) -LG(23Qs) -LR(25Qs).

The first LR was brutal. I don't exactly remember any of the questions specifically, but I think I had abnormal amount of Disagreement questions in the beginning.

The second LR had its first question about a recent trend of carpool and public transportation relationship, the questions were relatively easier than the first one.

I still have no clue which one is the experimental. But I have been seeing several test takers with 25Qs-25Qs LR sections which means that the first LR section (26Qs) that I had is likely to be the experimental.

Hope this helps.

Same here. What a great start of the day :neutral:

#help Why is "Bulge" the sufficient condition for "Broken Joist"? As far as I remember the 'The Only' lesson correctly, isn't "The Only Thing" in the stimulus modifying "Broken Joist" not "Bulge"? Am I missing something here?