I have this same struggle too, but I think it helps to take it one step at a time. Lets start with IF on the left
IF
which has a "no" so we will negate it
/IF
then we have "without" RL so first lets add the RL to the chain
/IF -> RL
and then work with the "without", which means we negate suff so the statement now reads, but because the suff is already negated the negation cancels out and we have
Hi! I thought they removed the limit of no more than 3 tests per testing period.
1
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
hi!
I have this same struggle too, but I think it helps to take it one step at a time. Lets start with IF on the left
IF
which has a "no" so we will negate it
/IF
then we have "without" RL so first lets add the RL to the chain
/IF -> RL
and then work with the "without", which means we negate suff so the statement now reads, but because the suff is already negated the negation cancels out and we have
IF -> RL