Self-study
yzhan107918
Why is there only video explanations for the game section of the February 1997 test? (Ultimate+)
Am I missing something here?
yzhan107918
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
yzhan107918
Friday, May 24, 2019
I thought C was correct because if there are no discernible differences between a masterwork and an inferior work, then mistakes(and thus wrong attributions) are not uncommon, so it supports that traditional attribution should not have so much weight? Anyone thought the same and anyone to point out where I was wrong?
#help (Added by Admin)
yzhan107918
Thursday, May 2, 2019
My take is that D is not the preferred answer because the "complaint" claim isn't evidence for the "intellectual skills" claim, it 's evidence for something else. Just like if I am seeking evidence that A is not causing B, I do not see the fact that in the past a certain event C(one similar to A) failed to cause D (a similar thing to B) serves as evidence that now A is not causing B. This is different take than JY's, but I hope it makes some sense, too.
I made the exact same mistake as yours, but upon closer examination, A does not hold for because it basically says:
computer programs should be developed by both large and small corporations,
and the negation of that should be:
computer programs should be developed by neither large nor small corporations.
our negation does not hold because it negates only part of the sentence.