Discussions

User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT155.S1.Q24
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Wednesday, Sep 07 2022

it's more so that if something is considered to be "often", then it is necessary that it also be "at least some". Like for example if people often go the superstore then it is necessary that atleast some people go to the superstore.

1
PrepTests ·
PT156.S1.P4.Q22
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Wednesday, Sep 07 2022

For question 22, how is answer D even accurate? Sure, the passage does say that it was probably that the rain-induced sandslides killed those dinosaurs, but to say "rather than sandstorms" is incorrect. the passage never even mentioned the idea that sandstorms killed them. It talked about sandstorms protecting the already dead animal bones from being scavenged.

0
PrepTests ·
PT144.S4.Q18
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Wednesday, Aug 31 2022

I don't feel that E is necessary to be true. Just because it's harder by boat doesn't mean it couldn't have happened. For example, say that going by boat was more difficult than over land; but going by boat was safer than land. (safe doesn't mean less difficult). And it just so happened that the traders valued safety over difficulty. What then?

1
PrepTests ·
PT146.S2.Q19
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Wednesday, Aug 24 2022

okay, say it rains really hard one day, and a new large body of water is created right beside the pipes and transition lines. and say that all the other conditions are satisfied. then here, wouldn't we have a situation where an electric station can be made, without expanding the pipes??

0
PrepTests ·
PT112.S1.Q18
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Monday, Aug 22 2022

That is precisely the logical sequencing that allowed me to come to the correct answer

8
Study Groups · September LSAT group?
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Saturday, Aug 20 2022

i feel a bit late to this but im interested too!!

0
PrepTests ·
PT150.S3.Q10
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Thursday, Aug 18 2022

man... not too long ago there was a question really similar to this one where the very big trap answer was that it used a word kind of like "instructs" and the issue with it was that just because someone is instructed doesn't mean it is required. aka the language was too weak to justify it. It's just kinda annoying that it just happens to be the correct answer here.

5
User Avatar
•

Saturday, Aug 13 2022

zakariamahmoud422171

reviewing wrong answers

Hey everyone, so I'm at that stage were I'm spamming practice tests/reviewing them afterwords. and I've really hit an issue with reviewing my answers for logical reasoning. My problem is every time I go to review the questions and try to re-solve them, I noticed that I already have the answer memorized before I even finish the stimulus and what's worse is I have the reason it was correct memorized too so I don't feel like I'm able to learn how to solve it properly for a similar question. Even for PTs I did weeks ago same issue. What do I do...

Also while you're still here bonus here, any tips on reviewing wrong answers on LR when there's no particular pattern to which types I get wrong?

0
PrepTests ·
PT151.S3.Q17
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Saturday, Aug 13 2022

honestly I was thinking the exact same thing

2
Lessons · Theory - Part 1 (NA)
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Tuesday, May 24 2022

it always hits rly hard when I hear his name:(

2
Study Groups · Study Group for 2023 LSATs
User Avatar
zakariamahmoud422171
Monday, May 09 2022

same:)

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?