Subscription pricing
Hey guys,
How can we tell the difference between a causal assertion and a “if then” statement?
I chose D by intuition, but I did struggle for a long while.
JY mentions “causation” between using a car phone & pose a threat to safe driving during his explanation.
In essence, if A causes B, then decrease A also decrease the likelihood of B.
Yes, if we explain it in such a manner, then it makes sense to me.
However, I wonder how do we know “using a car phone seriously distracts the driver, which in turn poses a threat to safe driving” is not a “if then” statement?
If using car phone –> pose threat to safe driving
If this is the case, /using car phone does NOT lead to /pose threat to safe driving (the oldest trick in the book)
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-4-question-13/
This is my second attempt at answering this question. I selected B the previous time, and I chose A this time. Even if I'm mistaken again, I'm still thrilled. At the very least, I'm on the correct route and fall into the trap that LSAC has set for me.