- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
#help
According to Merriam-Webster,
Consensus means "a general agreement about something: an idea or opinion that is shared by all the people in a group"
I wonder why A is wrong; since W mentions the "consensus"
This is my second attempt at answering this question. I selected B the previous time, and I chose A this time. Even if I'm mistaken again, I'm still thrilled. At the very least, I'm on the correct route and fall into the trap that LSAC has set for me.
Hey guys,
How can we tell the difference between a causal assertion and a “if then” statement?
I chose D by intuition, but I did struggle for a long while.
JY mentions “causation” between using a car phone & pose a threat to safe driving during his explanation.
In essence, if A causes B, then decrease A also decrease the likelihood of B.
Yes, if we explain it in such a manner, then it makes sense to me.
However, I wonder how do we know “using a car phone seriously distracts the driver, which in turn poses a threat to safe driving” is not a “if then” statement?
If using car phone –> pose threat to safe driving
If this is the case, /using car phone does NOT lead to /pose threat to safe driving (the oldest trick in the book)
Admin Note: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-4-question-13/
#help
How can we tell the difference between a causal assertion and a "if then" statement?
I chose D by intuition, but I did struggle for a long while.
JY mentions "causation" between using a car phone & pose a threat to safe driving during his explanation.
In essence, if A causes B, then decrease A also decrease the likelihood of B.
Yes, if we explain it in such a manner, then it makes sense to me.
However, I wonder how do we know "using a car phone seriously distracts the driver, which in turn poses a threat to safe driving" is not a "if then" statement?
If using car phone --> pose threat to safe driving
If this is the case, /using car phone does NOT lead to /pose threat to safe driving (the oldest trick in the book)
lol, I literally thought "larger sea animals"refer to large-size sea animals such as walrus.
lol I literally thought "Eschewing" is the person's first name and totally misread the whole sentence.
Please ignore me... So stupid question...
It turns out I did not drink enough coffee this morning.
Lol, I actually assumed "latter" meant works made after the twentieth century.