Hi Guys,
I am currently at the exact 50% mark of the core curriculum, which is right in the middle of the NA problem sets, and I have a test date booked for August. I am wondering if it is most beneficial to finish the core curriculum before starting PTs (I have only done one full test, the diagnostic, thus far). Thanks for your opinion!
Hi Guys,
I am currently at the exact 50% mark of the core curriculum, which is right in the middle of the NA problem sets, and I have a test date booked for August. I am wondering if it is most beneficial to finish the core curriculum before starting PTs (I have only done one full test, the diagnostic, thus far). Thanks for your opinion!
The part I can not wrap my brain around is that AC E says at least one (so some) while the stimulus says many which I thought had to be at least more than one?
#help
I initially chose AC A but then in BR switched to AC B because I viewed the definitive "we can never know" as too big an assumption. How do we know there are not other ways besides "standing outside all of history" to determine if it is the end of history?
#help
Answer B is correct because the narrower boards could be either just slightly less expensive, or more expensive than the wide floor boards. The bigger homes have more surface area to cover so using these narrower boards is a greater display of wealth as we know that the narrower boards do not save costs when compared to the wide floor boards used in the smaller homes. Thus it is a status symbol to use narrower boards in a bigger home.
My explanation for why AC A is not correct: the stimulus says that some bridges that need the serious rehab are not suspension bridges. We can not say that some bridges that do need rehab are not suspension bridges though, therefore we can not make the assumption in AC A. I did not understand JY's explanation and had to really think about this ugh