I've been practicing logic games from PT 52-61recently, finding these games seem much different from the older ones like those from 1-50. I heard people saying that the logic games from PT 52-61 are actually easier than the older ones. But I personally found them more challenging.
I haven't touched PT 62-72 yet. Can someone tell me whether or how the games in these PTs are different from those in PT 52-61?
I've been using a book classifying LR questions from PrepTest 1-20 into different types but found the questions in it are a bit tough and different from recent LR questions. Is it still useful to get practice from these questions? I mean, by how much?
Any thoughts on this?
Hi Joe,
I just read this reply. I've been practicing older LGs and they've been helpful. I do think I have to start drilling older LR questions to get more practice.
Thanks,
Jason
Thank you for all the responses. I've been reviewing the LGs from PT 52-61 these days for the second time. I really found that the LGs from the PT 52-61 require less main diagrams. I've done LGs from PT 1-50 actually. Those LGs seem require decent main diagrams and good main diagrams would almost make the remaining questions fly, but it seems that the LGs from PT 52-61 are more flexible with the questions with few main diagrams to draw.
In PT 29-38. I usually got 1-3 wrong.
But in PT 52-61, it became 3-6.
So I'm guessing that I spent unnecessary time trying to make main diagrams, which made me worse-off.
Am I correct?
Thank you so much for telling me the importance of old LG games, and the most thrilling LG questions will be those I have no experience dealing with before..
What about the old logical reasoning questions, especially those from PrepTests 1-20?