Adding "caused by" to Group 1 logical indicators.

TheDeterminedC · March 2017

I am about halfway though the CC and all of these indicators have really turned into second nature for me.
Although this is the case, I would really like to see “caused by” added into the Group 1 indicators, as it has really messed with my head. A clear example of this is on LSAT #25 S4 Q12. This question would have been an easy one have I would have known earlier. Lesson learned!

What are other people's thoughts? Is group 1 even the correct rule?

BinghamtonDave · March 2017

"Caused by" normally does not indicate a sufficient/necessity relationship. "Caused by" indicates a causal relationship. Conditional logic and causation are two different types of logic that underpin the LSAT.

Please consider reviewing this lesson: https://7sage.com/lesson/causation/

David

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

Adding "caused by" to Group 1 logical indicators.

Can all "Group 1" logical indicators be negated to "some not"Hello everyone! I'm still going through the CC and reached the section about "Some and Most Relationships." I understand that the negation of "all" i…

[CLOSED] Looking to form a group to do 1 PT/week.Hi community, Looking to form a group of motivated studiers to BR one PT/week over the summer. Anyone who wants to join can do so using this l…

Partner in med school, trying to pick 1-2 law schools to apply toHi all, weird question here. My partner is currently deciding between med schools, and I'm planning on applying to law school this fall wherever she …

Help needed! How to improve from high 160s to mid to high170s?!Thanks to J.Y. and 7 sage, my PT scores have improved from the low 160s to the high 160s or low 170s. But I have not been able to make further im…

-2 to -4 Reading Comprehension, -5 to -9 LR Total, -4 to -9 On Logic Games (166-170 goal)I think that my situation here is atypical. I think I studied all wrong, and I am unsure if I am screwed because of it. I am blessed in that from …

Comments