PT52.S3.Q07 - gotera: infants lack the motor ability

extramediumextramedium Alum Member
edited March 2017 in Logical Reasoning 419 karma

Can someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus?

I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence fits into the conditional framework. It doesn't seem like it plays a role there.

All I can see with this, and it leads you straight to the answer, is:

Sentence 1: PPS-->MA
Conclusion: SA-->MA

Answer A: SA-->PPS

The negation didn't help me here since I didn't understand the conditional language at first, which is why I picked the wrong answer. If someone can explain why the negation would hurt the conclusion here, I'd be very grateful. Thank you.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question-07/

Sign In or Register to comment.