Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Flaws between Premise & Sub-conclusion vs. Sub-conclusion & Main Conclusion

yellowavcableyellowavcable Alum Member

I just worked through PT 44.4.20 and noticed the flaw traced to the lack of support between the premise and sub-conclusion. This is the first time I've encountered a question where the flaw hasn't been between the sub-conclusion and main conclusion. Is this common in other types of question, or does the LSAT usually focus on Sub-Conclusion to Main Conclusion flaws?

Sign In or Register to comment.