Access to PT A, B, C and Feb '97

Regis_Phalange63 · March 2018

Hi y'all,

I remain invisible(I'm just silently drilling LG's in my room) but I'm always so pleased to be a part of such a supportive community called 7sage!

Quick question here: I cannot find PT A, B, C and Feb '97 as part of the syllabus portion of the curriculum where I have been printing out every single PT released from the past. Is there a specific reason as to why these PT's are not offered?

Thanks for your help and happy studying !

akistotle · March 2018

@dkny2013 said:
Hi y'all,

I remain invisible(I'm just silently drilling LG's in my room) but I'm always so pleased to be a part of such a supportive community called 7sage!

Quick question here: I cannot find PT A, B, C and Feb '97 as part of the syllabus portion of the curriculum where I have been printing out every single PT released from the past. Is there a specific reason as to why these PT's are not offered?

Thanks for your help and happy studying !

I don't know the specific reason, but I believe it has to do with 7Sage's agreement with LSAC.

LastLSAT · March 2018

.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

Access to PT A, B, C and Feb '97

If A then B and C rewritten as if A and B then C??I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't …

A->B->C vs. A-> (B->C) lessonHey guys, I'm having trouble finding which lesson what I wrote in my notes is from. I have: Tuesday->rain->sad = if tuesday, it will rain, and it…

if A --> B, then can I say if A is likely to happen, then B will likely to happen?For example, PT 43 S2 Q10 I am trying to examine the stimulus with only logic and try to make sense of AC A. Acceptance of criticism requ…

A will ensure B -- does this mean A -> B or B -> A?Finally done with the LR section of CC and going through my notes. I dont remember which exact LR question this is from but I remember one of the…

A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument? I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not so…

Comments