Soooo maybe I’m wrong or maybe I’m crazy but I just figured out that with disagree and agree questions, the answer appeals to the conclusion of the first speaker. Is that a hack or am I reaching
I believe this is a reach in my experience. The actual disagreement can occur in any number of spots:
1.Flat out disagreement about the conclusion
2. Disagreement about whether or not the evidence provide is sufficient for the conclusion
3.Disagreement about an assumption in the argument
Another possible spot for a disagreement: the factual accuracy of a premise stated. This is a bit non-LSAT'ish, but on disagree questions, if one person states as fact that a certain proposition is true in the world, a possible disagreement can occur when the other person says: no, that is not the case.
PT 66-4-23 about shrimp farming is an example that comes to mind.
Comments
I believe this is a reach in my experience. The actual disagreement can occur in any number of spots:
1.Flat out disagreement about the conclusion
2. Disagreement about whether or not the evidence provide is sufficient for the conclusion
3.Disagreement about an assumption in the argument
David
There is no hack to the LSAT. You are reaching.
Another possible spot for a disagreement: the factual accuracy of a premise stated. This is a bit non-LSAT'ish, but on disagree questions, if one person states as fact that a certain proposition is true in the world, a possible disagreement can occur when the other person says: no, that is not the case.
PT 66-4-23 about shrimp farming is an example that comes to mind.
Thanks everyone. I knew it was too good to be true.
I will say that on PT84 there were a lot more agree with a bit of an inference than disagree questions.