PT34.S3.Q23 - societies in which value is measured primarily in financial terms

Dgelf321

J.Y. can you please put up an explanation for this one?

admin edit 09-01-2016: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-23/

alexroark5

@Dgelf321 the logical form of this flawed argument is:

if A --> B
not A
therefore Not B

it is a common invald argument form. I would revisit that section of JY's course.

make sure you know what "invariably" means, it indicates a sufficient condition. Also, for this question element B represents isolated socieities and NOT B represents socially unified socieities. Maybe that was part of the confusion?