I have watched this lesson at least five times. I tried to do the questions but I can't weaken the argument. I don't know how to apply the Causation Theory and Strategy to each question. When I try to solve the questions all I think is the answer with the alternative cause is the correct one. Help.
Comments
A more general (and hopefully more helpful) approach is 2-step.
1. Recognize that the argument is using causation. a and b (a correlation), therefore a causes b, for example.
2. look for an answer choice that challenges that logic. it's true that there is the alt cause theory.
C caused a and b. But it could also be b caused a OR no relationship.
so definitely memorize those, but also use what you know about breaking bonds between the premise and conclusion to help you. But once you identify the argument as causation - you have a leg up in getting the right answer. Sometimes - to make it easy for me - I will actually write out F then G | F causes G next to the stimulus and compare that to AC's to help me find something that weakens the link.
Causation implies Correlation. (Causation-->Correlation).
What's the contrapositive?
/Correlation-->/Causation (If there is no correlation, there can be no causation).
Well what about Correlation implies Causation? (Well, no. That wouldn't be substantiated because you can have many things correlate and not necessarily be causally-linked.)
Same goes for:
Causation implies Chronology
Contrapositive: /Chronology-->/Causation
Causation implies Coincidence
Contrapositive: /Coincidence-->/Causation
Hope this helps!