It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I just listened to the podcast episode with Al (highly recommended!) where he mentions how he practiced LG to account for his nerves by learning to distinguish between 'brute force games' vs. 'inference based games' (he didn't use these exact terms but that was the idea I think). I just loved his idea but felt the need to solidify his approach so I can apply it too. From what I gather, he mainly practiced two things for this:
Infer the plainly obvious (for like 10 secs) and stop. Proceed to other rules/questions.
He did 2 sections this way every day.
Trying to solve the game as much as possible from the rules.
He did this for harder games (games 3 and 4) without worrying about the time.
I feel like if you're like me (and Al for that matter) and you do well with typical sequencing/grouping games but choke when you get to the toughest/misc. game because you can't find the inferences (and are also unable to brute force because you want to find inferences), I think you'll really benefit from Al's approach. Here's how I'm thinking of putting his method into practice:
I'm curious how everyone else who listened the episode thinks about his method and how to apply it. Couldn't find his username but Al, your input would be very much appreciated if you happen see this post!
Admin Note:
7sage.com/forums/profile/lexxx745
@lexxx745
Comments
Interesting! Thanks for sharing