Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Valid or Mundane?In this example:<br /> <br /> True Premise: A --> B<br /> True Premise: B --> C<br /> <br /> Inference: A--> B --> C<br /> <b…
Looking for a Study Buddy or Study Buddies (virtually or in EPTX [inclusive-or for both ors])Hi there!<br /> <br /> My name is Jaganath, and I've been studying off and on with 7sage for four years. I am a non-traditional student: I'm 34. <b…
Upgrade to Premium or Ultimate or neither?I'm retaking the lsat in December, and my 7sage course is going to run out next week. I'd love some outside opinions while weighing my choice of stud…
Diagramming either or and either or but not bothI understand the difference between either or and either or but not both<br /> <br /> I am confused about the diagramming aspect and not sure if my…
To annotate or not ? Annotation or just read through?So far, I've tried circling all transition words (ex: but, however, therefore) and important words that specify the author's viewpoint, but I've foun…

Valid or Mundane?

hotranchsauce Member

August 2021 in Logical Reasoning 288 karma

In this example:

True Premise: A --> B
True Premise: B --> C

Inference: A--> B --> C

Is the inference a valid conclusion? Or is it just like a mundane re statement or the premises? Is it even an inference?

A --> C would of course be a valid and true inference or conclusion (depending on argument setup), right?

Show Related Discussions

or Register to comment.