It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
STATEMENT 1: "A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and **functional...
inviting + functional for public use --> ~obtrusive
contrapositive: obtrusive --> ~inviting or ~functional for public use
STATEMENT 2: "Modern architects, plagued by egoism...
We are thus told that modern architects (because they let their strong personalities take over their work) are producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Answer choice B states that "modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive." In other words, they produce obtrusive buildings.
The stimulus tells us that modern architects are producing buildings that are not functional for public use. We know from the contrapositive of the first statement that if a building is obtrusive, then it is either not inviting or it is not functional for public use. Does it follow that a building that is not functional for public use is obtrusive? No it does not: that would constitute a mistaken reversal of the conditional statement.
Please #help
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question." Also, removed the portions of the stimulus as posting the entire stimulus on the Forum is not allowed. See our Forum Rules here: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15.
Comments
This post is regarding PT3 Section 2 Question 4
help