It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hi,
Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence?
In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, society should not restrict the performance of any of the actions of adults or interfere with the likely results except to prevent negative effects on others.
This short premise is originally from PT 69 Section 2 Q15. The way JY interprets except in the sentence is that "if there is interference, then it is to prevent negative effects on others". I understand this logical transition. However, in the syllabus, doesn't he say that "except" is a bi-conditional indicator? So, will we use "except" as a bi-conditional indicator here to translate the logic?
Thank you for the help!!!! I sincerely appreciate any helpful comments.
Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."