It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- 29.8K All Categories
- 25.3K LSAT
- 15.7K General
- 26 Sage Advice
- 4.5K Logical Reasoning
- 1.2K Reading Comprehension
- 1.6K Logic Games
- 65 Podcasts
- 186 Webinars
- 5 Scholarships
- 189 Test Center Reviews
- 1.7K Study Groups
- 98 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.2K Specific LSAT Dates
- 10 June 2023 LSAT
- 3 April 2023 LSAT
- 9 February 2023 LSAT
- 25 January 2023 LSAT
- 4.5K Not LSAT
- 3.7K Law School Admissions
- 8 Law School Explained
- 11 Forum Rules
- 502 Technical Problems
- 265 Off-topic

cole.w.murdoch
Alum Member

Hey everyone, if someone could give me a quick explanation on failing either the sufficient or necessary I would greatly appreciate it.

In LSAT Prep Test 15 (June 1995) - Section 4 - Logic Game 3 JY does exactly that during question 19. Here is a link: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-15-section-4-game-3/

There I asked, "Can I get clarification on how rule 5 becomes irrelevant during question 19? I usually understand satisfying the necessary but this mixed me up. If F is on 4 and 6, then J has to be on 3; that I understand. Because of this, G does not have to be on 1, correct? However, it still can be. When the necessary condition is satisfied through the question stem (as that is what happens in 19) then sufficient condition (G) becomes a floater?"

Furthermore, JY also shows a similar scenario when explaining rule 3 here: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-11-section-1-game-2/

Thanks!

In LSAT Prep Test 15 (June 1995) - Section 4 - Logic Game 3 JY does exactly that during question 19. Here is a link: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-15-section-4-game-3/

There I asked, "Can I get clarification on how rule 5 becomes irrelevant during question 19? I usually understand satisfying the necessary but this mixed me up. If F is on 4 and 6, then J has to be on 3; that I understand. Because of this, G does not have to be on 1, correct? However, it still can be. When the necessary condition is satisfied through the question stem (as that is what happens in 19) then sufficient condition (G) becomes a floater?"

Furthermore, JY also shows a similar scenario when explaining rule 3 here: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-11-section-1-game-2/

Thanks!

## Comments

Deny (fail) sufficient:

We're told that A is in the out group. This means the first part of the rule falls away and we're left with B ---> C as our only rule.

Deny (fail) necessary:

We're told that C is in the out group. This means we can run the contrapositive back through our chained-up conditional statement. So, if C is out, then we know B is out and A is out.

Bonus round:

We're told that B is out. When this happens we're failing the necessary condition for A ---> B, but failing the sufficient condition for B---> C. What does this mean? Well, it means A and B are out, and C is a floater.

Try and do something similar for this:

/A ---> B ---> /C