eatmy

Comments

• BinghamtonDave Alum Member ⭐ 🍌🍌

  February 2018 edited February 2018 8716 karma

  .> @kkhodaverdian said:

  That's the same reversal as in the premise is it not? What am I missing.

  I have yet to take this test, but I just noticed your post has yet to have any follow up.
  Logically, these are the same mistake:

  If the conditional given is:
  A--->B
  Premise gives us B
  Argument concludes: A

  And

  The conditional given is:
  A--->B
  Premise gives us A
  Argument concludes B

  Both of these mistakes are the sufficient/necessary conflations, but they are operationally not the same mistake in the argument. The LSAT has indeed called on us to differentiate between these two mistakes before.

  I hope this helps and my apologies for not having that deep of an answer here because I have yet to take this PT.

  David