Short question about Some/Most relationship

lawgical · February 2018

Premise: G –m→ F
Conclusion: C ←s→ G

This is a question from 7Sage course.
It is asking to find sufficient assumption and the correct answer is F-->C.
I totally agree with the answer, however, was wondering F--m-->C can also be the correct answer.

FixedDice · February 2018

No. You cannot make a valid deduction from "G -m--> F -m-> C." It is possible, but it is not valid (i.e. 100% true). See "Invalid Argument Form (6 of 7)" under "Invalid Argument Forms."

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

Short question about Some/Most relationship

A question about "some" and "most" relationshipMost A are C; Most B are C, can we make the link that "some A are B"?

Question regarding most/some statementshttps://7sage.com/lesson/advanced-valid-forms-review/ We have B-most->Z which implies two inferences B-most->C and B-most->/O. When you combine B-…

Question about CBT vs MBF relationship when eliminating answersIs the opposite of "Could be True" "Must be False"? So for a CBT question would all the incorrect answers be MBFs? Also does it make sense to say …

PT 2 S2 Question 4 Can I infer some people are -P from the statement that most people are P?Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but …

P52-S2-Q14 Game #3 - what is the most efficient and effective strategy to tackle this question?Thanks in advance and I hope this helps other people as well. (I watched J.Y.'s video, but I would like to see more strategies that work).

Comments