PT5.S1.Q19 - A tree's age can be determined by counting

wkim2015wkim2015 Alum Member
edited May 2018 in Logical Reasoning 86 karma

Hi guys,

Can anyone explain why the answer choice (c) is the correct answer? It's hard to see why this has to be the case when logs already have each ring representing one year. With this fact, it's already possible to know how old these logs are so why do we need this information?

Thank you!

Admin note: edited title

Comments

  • thisisspartathisissparta Alum Member
    1363 karma

    The archaeologists are looking for the relative age of the tombs to one another. In other words, they're seeking to establish which tomb is the oldest and which is the youngest.

    (C) states that each log has (among its other rings) a distinctive 12 year pattern on the rings. This distinctive 12 year pattern is used as a benchmark to help determine which log is older and which is younger.

    A tree with the distinctive pattern + 2 rings is younger than a tree with the distinctive pattern + 5 rings.

  • wkim2015wkim2015 Alum Member
    86 karma

    thanks for the reply! but where does it say that they are looking for the relative age of the tombs to one another?

    your explanation on why C was correct makes perfect sense assuming that they're looking for the relative age of the tombs to one another. were we to assume that because they said "relative age?"

  • thisisspartathisissparta Alum Member
    1363 karma

    @wkim2015 said:
    thanks for the reply! but where does it say that they are looking for the relative age of the tombs to one another?

    your explanation on why C was correct makes perfect sense assuming that they're looking for the relative age of the tombs to one another. were we to assume that because they said "relative age?"

    That's exactly right! "Relative ages of the ancient tombs" here implied that the tombs were being compared to one another.

  • wkim2015wkim2015 Alum Member
    86 karma

    thanks so much!! I appreciate it!

Sign In or Register to comment.