It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I could not figure out why this is a circular reasoning...or my understanding of CR is too mechanical?
the conclusion is "....ought to do C..."
the only premise is "it is better if C happens"
the flaw I thought was the switch from the descriptive language to the prescriptive one
Admin note: edited title
Comments
I think in this case it might be most helpful to ignore the middle part about "although some drinkers would prefer to....or in some other manner."
The only premise, as you mentioned, is "it is better if C happens." In this case you can infer that the conclusion is pretty much saying it is better to do C. Thus, the way to actually read it is conclusion=it is better to do C because premise=it is better if C happens. Let me know if it looks more like circular reasoning now.
thank you! now it looks like circular reasoning; I think there is a small assumption made here? (better =ought to) or am I being too mechanical?
Yeah it's a bit of an inference since they're saying you ought to do it because it is better. I think it'll start being more obvious what is being inferred but isn't written later in your studies.
thank you!