It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I put D as my answer to this question, but the correct answer is A. I don't understand why, since the stipulation for a work to be considered unique is for it to have historical or aesthetic value. How would that apply to an unflattering painting of someone's father?
Admin note: edited title
Comments
Jorge just says unique artwork must be preserved. Aesthetic or historic belong to posterity is the premise supporting J’s conclusion that unique works must be preserved, not a stipulation.
A describes a unique piece of art, so J would say the owner must preserve it despite not liking it and Shanna would say the owner can do whatever they want and destroy it if they wish.
D talks about works of art that are not unique, which J says nothing about.