Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.6K All Categories
- 28.2K LSAT
- 17.1K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 11 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.2K Study Groups
- 112 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 36 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 647 Technical Problems
- 288 Off-topic
PT1.S3.Q9 - Fines levied against those responsible (weaken)
dmlang22
Member
How does AC A weaken this? I chose AC D but I didn’t get the relevance of A/couldn’t translate what it was saying.
Admin Note: Edited the title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"
Comments
The conclusion says companies that might have these accidents will now install adequate safeguards. Answer A weakens because if businesses underestimate their accident risk, then they have less reason to install adequate safeguards. A business may really suck at predicting their future accident risk. Then have a bunch of accidents which result in fines.
I don't think answer D strenghthens nor weakens the argument. D confirms that businesses recognize fines affect their profits. Fines are an ordinary business expense.
ty! that makes a lot of sense