It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Anyone have advice on determining when a flaw question has jumped from a correlation to a cause and effect argument? Each flaw question I do with correlation and causation in the mix, I never can identify when the AC is 'infers cause from mere correlation'. Any help is appreciated!
Comments
Drill those questions and pay attention to the correlative language. You have to be able to pick up when they are giving you a correlative relationship, then you can anticipate the causal conclusion.
red cars tend to get into more accidents
a recent study shows those who live near power lines have a higher than average rate of cancer
every time I walk outside it starts to rain
...and so on.
There is a list of some of them here: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/29425/flaw-types-with-example-questions-redux-2021-pandemic-cycle-version
Under "5) Causation confusions"
Also something to watch for on harder questions: it is also a flaw to ignore a correlation. In other words correlation ≠ causation, but also correlation ≠ not causation.