Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 32.1K All Categories
- 27.1K LSAT
- 16.5K General
- 5K Logical Reasoning
- 1.3K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 9 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2K Study Groups
- 108 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.4K Specific LSAT Dates
- 1 June 2024 LSAT
- 1 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 41 October 2023 LSAT
- 12 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 1 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 4.8K Not LSAT
- 3.9K Law School Admissions
- 11 Law School Explained
- 9 Forum Rules
- 573 Technical Problems
- 280 Off-topic
Related Discussions
Thoughts on Loophole Translations and CLIR
WhatIsLife
Member
I'm averaging around -5 to -7 on Logical Reasoning and I really feel like I'm stuck score wise. I notice that some people swear by Translations and CLIR drills, can anyone give their thoughts on these two drills?
Comments
Translation helps me. CLIR doesn't. I dont know why CLIR just makes things more complicated for me
Translating the flaw/gap in each stimulus is what helped me! CLIR is eh/maybe.
Translating the flaw/gap IS part of CLIR though. Translating and CLIRing is essentially an entirely new way of doing LR -- focus on the stimulus, identify the stimulus, and CLIRing the stimulus. I credit this with my LR improvement. I was -8/-7 before the Loophole, and I'm now -1/-0.