PT85.S2.Q9 - Pharmaceutical manufacturers

Comments

• 1 Like

  5Fennel LSAT Member

  November 2022 192 karma

  Good morning,

  E doesn't have any effect on the argument because the premises concern the number of visits per representative, and not the number of visits per physician, and thereby does not address the flawed necessary assumption in the argument. From the premises, it cannot be determined if invididual physicians received more or fewer visits.

  The argument depends on the assumption that fewer visits per representative indicates that the promotion is counterproductive, and there are many ways that the assumption can be negated, which A directly addresses - fewer visits yes, but more time to each physician can be interpreted as not counterproductive.
• 1 Like

  Star Platinum Member

  November 2022 83 karma

  That was so helpful. Thank you so much!