Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.5K All Categories
- 28.1K LSAT
- 17.1K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 191 Webinars
- 11 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.2K Study Groups
- 112 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 31 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 641 Technical Problems
- 286 Off-topic
PT4.S1.Q16 - The current proposal to give college students a broader choice...
Avatario43
Core Member
why is it A (avoids the issue instead by instead focusing on supporters of proposal) instead of C (fails to define the critical term “satisfied?” Like why? I don't understand?
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
Comments
What "satisfied" means is irrelevant. You can replace it with any other word, for example "rejoicing" or "giddy," and the problem with the argument doesn't change. Imagine this: somebody just told you that we have to abandon a certain proposal. To support their position they tell you that the people who support the proposal will never be (insert whatever adjective). They then proceed to tell you about specific people. What's your reaction?
Your reaction should be: Ok...? Great...? Who cares that the people who support it will never be (insert literally whatever adjective)? How does that serve as evidence to abandon a proposal? There hasn't been a single point of actual evidence to suggest why the proposal should be abandonded.