Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.5K All Categories
- 28.2K LSAT
- 17.1K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 11 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.2K Study Groups
- 112 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 36 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 646 Technical Problems
- 288 Off-topic
PT15.S4.Q14 (G3) - car pool to commute to work...
hendricks
Live Member
I selected D, but the correct answer is E. Can someone help me understand why D is wrong?
If I put Gina in the Wednesday slot, I am wondering why this pattern won't work:
HJGHFJ
Struggling to see what rule I am violating. Thanks.
Comments
Q14 is an acceptable situation question, so I think you might be talking about Q19? Q19 gives us an additional premise that F drives exactly twice during the week, and that F doesn't drive on Tuesday or Wednesday. The situation you have above only has F driving once, so that is why (D) is incorrect. Since it was not violating any of the original rules but instead the one given in the premise, that might be why it looked correct.
Other way to see (D) is incorrect: Since F already can't drive on Monday, that only leaves us with Thursday, Friday, and Saturday as the possible days for the two Fs. Since they can't be consecutive that means F must drive on Thursday and Saturday. J must drive on Wednesday or Saturday, and so if J can't be on Saturday, it must be on Wednesday. Thus, G can't drive on Wednesday.