Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.4K All Categories
- 28.1K LSAT
- 17.1K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 194 Webinars
- 14 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.2K Study Groups
- 111 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 31 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 636 Technical Problems
- 286 Off-topic
PT4.S1.Q17 - The question whether intelligent life exists elsewhere...
almoglandsberg1
Core Member
the conclusion states it is not limited, but imprecise
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question
Comments
Answer C is a claim the stimulus can serve as an objection to. The stimulus can be summed up as "we cannot make our definition of intelligent life more precise as it is likely the intelligent life we find will not fit those parameters and maybe limit our search range, making it less likely we find intelligent life." Therefore, answer C claiming it needs to be made more precise/narrowed to find intelligent life is at odds with the stimulus and the stimulus serves as an objection to that claim.