Premise 1: Free Poetry readings take place almost every Wednesday. Premise 2: If a poetry reading takes place then there is half priced coffee all day.
According to choice E, there are some Wednesdays when there is no half-priced coffee.
But quick, back to to the stimulus:
If PR (which occurs almost every wednesday) ---> then HPC
But according to Choice E:
No HPC on some Wednesdays.
What this choice is betting on, is you making the mistake of thinking that free poetry is necessary for half priced coffee to occur. This is not the case.
The contrapositive of the stimulus is:
No HPC ---> No Poetry Reading
NOT
HPC ---> Poetry Reading
In summa:
There cannot be a poetry reading on Wednesday if there is no half priced coffee that day. BUT, Wednesday could simply be half-priced-coffee-day, every week, whether or not there is a poetry reading.
The 'almost every Wednesday' is there to trick you - it only refers to how often poetry occurs, not to how often half priced coffee occurs. Half priced coffee is necessary for poetry to occur but not sufficient. Therefore we have no idea, if there are some Wednesdays without half priced coffee. There could be but we don't know for sure, and so choice (E) is wrong.
Yeah....you shouldn't have diagrammed W-Most -> FPR, or inferred what you did.. That's where you got lost. The 'almost every wednesday' is there to tell you how often the FRP --> HPC relationship occurs. It does not produce any logic statements by itself.
Comments
Going back to the stimulus:
Premise 1: Free Poetry readings take place almost every Wednesday.
Premise 2: If a poetry reading takes place then there is half priced coffee all day.
According to choice E, there are some Wednesdays when there is no half-priced coffee.
But quick, back to to the stimulus:
If PR (which occurs almost every wednesday) ---> then HPC
But according to Choice E:
No HPC on some Wednesdays.
What this choice is betting on, is you making the mistake of thinking that free poetry is necessary for half priced coffee to occur. This is not the case.
The contrapositive of the stimulus is:
No HPC ---> No Poetry Reading
NOT
HPC ---> Poetry Reading
In summa:
There cannot be a poetry reading on Wednesday if there is no half priced coffee that day. BUT, Wednesday could simply be half-priced-coffee-day, every week, whether or not there is a poetry reading.
The 'almost every Wednesday' is there to trick you - it only refers to how often poetry occurs, not to how often half priced coffee occurs. Half priced coffee is necessary for poetry to occur but not sufficient. Therefore we have no idea, if there are some Wednesdays without half priced coffee. There could be but we don't know for sure, and so choice (E) is wrong.
Hope this helps.
This is how I initially diagramed it.
W-Most->FPR
FRP->HPC
Linked up: W-most->HPC
I see, I cannot conclude from a most statement that "some not"....
That's where you got lost.
The 'almost every wednesday' is there to tell you how often the FRP --> HPC relationship occurs. It does not produce any logic statements by itself.